How to Avoid Yet Another Restructuring

user Andrew Blum
calendar

Many of our clients have recently undergone or are now undergoing a series of organizational structure changes, and despite the best of intentions, all too often they find it’s time to reorganize again just as soon as the new structure is in place.

This leads to a fundamental point: changing boxes on an org chart seldom changes anything.

We say this because, in the time it takes to vet, announce and implement a whole new structure, the initial impetus for change very often loses its relevance. So organizations repeat the cycle. This can lead to reorg after reorg and change initiative after change initiative… and a stalled organization unable to put down the mirror and look away from itself.

The dynamic of “organizational narcissism” is most problematic when it leads to a lack of external market focus and, ultimately, lack of connection to the customer.

Additionally, internal fixation often creates highly competitive environments in which leaders at all levels come to see success as getting a new position on the org chart rather than producing meaningful business results. It can become something of a game of musical chairs where getting a seat becomes a fierce battle. With each reorg, the frictions grow and become all the more debilitating.

We believe the traditional view of organization structure is at the root of the problem.

Specifically, traditional, hierarchical organizational structures – which are functionally based, geographically based, and/or product based – have inherent limitations. Most companies have recognized this and created matrixed structures of some kind to overcome the limitations, but in doing so they’ve found matrix decision-making accountabilities are foggy and things only work when goals are closely aligned and teamwork is at its absolute best.

So what’s a better fix? Lately we’ve been actively discussing the need to build more agile, networked organizations—organizations in which different empowered nodes share a mission, philosophy and set of high-level beliefs, and then each operates and thrives independent of deep, rigid hierarchy in a manner that brings critical knowledge in from the edges. This is about mindset and capability, not about structure.

Of course, creating a networked organization is easier said than done, so here are 3 “No Regrets” actions to enable flexibility without restructuring:

Unbalance the matrix structure. Nearly all large organizations today have some version of a matrix structure because there’s a natural need to coordinate functional activities with product or geographic priorities. This creates natural and often unresolvable tensions between centralized and decentralized authority, between functional and geographic authority, and so on. Often, the tension manifests in paralysis or acrimony. The answer is to make the tough call of deciding what one dimension of the structure should be fundamentally dominant and then to grant authority accordingly. Teamwork is great, but when difficult decisions need to be made quickly, it is important that there be clear ultimate accountability – this is the same reason there is generally just one CEO in a company. Unbalancing the matrix will not please everyone, but will do far more good than yet another reorganization.

Create more “soft” structures. Org charts naturally speak to hierarchy. So any time you move boxes on an org chart, you create complexity and emotional reaction. The same goes for moving lots of people amongst the boxes. But there’s another, easier way to shift resources and accountabilities in times of change: by creating and leveraging advisory councils, committees, and even temporary breakthrough teams to take on some new challenges as they arise. The key here is to develop a deep competence in structuring “soft” groups to tackle hard work – meaning they are effectively chartered and that their roles, accountabilities, and decision rights within the organization are clear. We’ve observed that, when done right, these groups often also enable the kind of cross-functional dialogues that matrix structures were initially intended to create.

OK juniors’ senior decisions. All too often, organizational structures are such that important decisions must be escalated… only to get bottlenecked at the top of the organization for extended periods of time. The reality is that there are many times when a situation requires people to improvise or otherwise act without first engaging senior leaders in dialogue or getting the appropriate authority. And more often than not, the actions junior people take without authority are directionally correct, and if not, it’s seldom the case that the repercussions of a wrong decision are worse than those of no decision. Fast moving companies make it ok for junior people to make senior decisions – under certain circumstances and within limits. Or they make it ok to ask forgiveness instead of permission. Ask yourself: When is the “Do Nothing” alternative any better?

 

What’s possible with agility
Some recent examples of what organizational agility and adaptivity can enable, from the recent news:

Walmart stores now routinely alter their inventories at different times throughout every month, selling larger packs at times when shoppers receive regular paychecks and government assistance funds, and smaller “get by” sizes when shoppers are often tight on funds.

A company called Ecovative has developed a commercially viable way to make land-filling Styrofoam packing materials obsolete—it’s ecocradle line is made from mushroom roots and agricultural byproducts like corn husks.

Android-based smartphones now hold more than 25% market share globally roughly two years after reaching stores, and Taiwanese maker HTC has skyrocketed from unknown contract manufacturer to name-brand player… and pricing.

The point: Regardless of your vertical, geography, etc., your world is changing. You can ignore or avoid the new reality, or you can respond to it. And you can respond with a static solution, or one that can accommodate more change. The choice is yours.

Back to TriumIQ

Let’s Talk

Contact Us

Trium IQ

Be a Step-Down Leader: A Radical, New Paradigm for Leading in Anxious Times

Your primary job as a leader – in your family, community, or career – is to lower…

Read

VIDEO | Lightspeed Venture Partners Partner, Arif Janmohamed: Trium’s Expertise Applied to Venture Capital Firms

Lightspeed Venture Partners Partner Arif Janmohamed shares how Trium applies its unique expertise to Venture Capital firms.

Watch

VIDEO | MX Interim CEO & President, Shane Evans: Coaching through a Leadership Transition

MX Interim Chief Executive Officer and President Shane Evans shares the impact of Trium’s coaching through his transition to CEO of the company.

Watch

VIDEO | Zoom COO, Aparna Bawa: Advice to Leaders Considering Engaging a Coach

Zoom Chief Operating Officer Aparna Bawa shares her advice for leaders considering engaging a coach to support their development.

Watch

If You Want to Survive a Downturn, Invest in Leadership

We are all starting to feel the effects of the downturn and I’ve seen a lot of…

Read

How a Pry and Resist spiral between CEOs and CXOs is toxic to company culture, collaboration, & growth

A trace of “Pry and Resist” naturally exists in every leader-subordinate relationship. But for growth-stage CEOs (particularly…

Read

Three traits of a transformational leader

What qualities do leaders need to take their organization on a transformational journey: converting a seemingly far-off…

Read
Andrew Blum Clients Arif Janmohamed, Partner at Lightspeed Venture Partners, Aparna Bawa, COO at Zoom, and Daniel Dines, CEO at UiPath

VIDEO | Executives share their experience of being coached by Trium Founder & Chairman, Andrew Blum

Clients Aparna Bawa, COO of Zoom, Daniel Dines, CEO of UiPath and Arif Janmohamed, Partner at Lightspeed Venture Partners talk about their coaching experience with Andrew Blum, Founder and Chairman of The Trium Group.

Watch

Navigating Web3 | A Scenario Planning Toolkit for Leaders

Uncharted Waters Imagine you are the captain of a ship at sea. You look on your radar…

Read

The Future of Work

Return-to-office versus remote is becoming this generation’s defining debate about the future of work. The pandemic proved…

Read

Culture: An Overlooked Superpower of the C-Suite

In the first of a series of short dialogues about organizational culture, Trium Partners Catherine Gray and…

Read

VIDEO | Realtor.com CEO, David Doctorow: Working with Practical Experts at Trium

Realtor.com Chief Executive Officer David Doctorow shares how Trium’s unique blend of data and practicality have fostered lasting change.

Watch
Decision crossroads

The Real ROI of Executive Coaching

Looking at the stock market since 1930, an investor who missed the best 10 days each decade…

Read

How Do Destructive Leaders Attract Followers?

Examining the conformers and colluders who make destructive leadership possible.   KEY POINTS The toxic triangle posits…

Read

No More War

How can a world expect peace when each of us has yet to lay down the weapons…

Read

Three Critical Myths About Feedback

There is no doubt that the giving and receiving of feedback is one of the critical aspects…

Read